A Brief, Non-Political Reflection on the Komen/Planned Parenthood Situation

planned_parenthoodI don’t plan to use this blog as a political forum, so fear not – this post has nothing to do with my personal opinions on the missions of the Susan G. Komen Foundation and Planned Parenthood organizations. In addition, I admittedly haven’t read every word written on this subject so I’m speaking a bit off the cuff.

Having said that, as a professional evaluator, I did have a fairly immediate reaction to recent news reports of the Komen Foundation’s decision (and subsequent about-face) to cut funding to Planned Parenthood.

As I watched article after article pop up in the media, my main question was this: where were the data? The reports, quite frankly, left me with more questions than answers. Questions like these:

  • Were Planned Parenthood offices not performing in compliance with their grant awards?
  • How did their performance stack up to other Komen grantees?
  • What was Komen’s history in funding organizations under investigation?
  • Just what were the revisions to the grant-making criteria, and why were these changes made?

With all those points unaddressed, I didn’t have a clue as to why Komen made their decision. I suspect that someone along the way suggested that the public wouldn’t be interested in the pesky details…and that was a mistake, in my opinion.

As a society, we’ve become more demanding for accountability, both among those who receive funds as well as those who distribute them. Regardless of which role you serve, evidence counts.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.